Online newsroom earns Pulitzer

I thought this story was an interesting one that will be of special interest to NextNewsroom readers. This I found to be especially interesting:

But while the Internet did score a victory this year, up from zero
awards last year, it still lags behind its more conventional
counterpart—newsprint. The Washington Post racked up the most Pulitzers,
amassing four for its work in Feature Writing, Commentary, Criticism,
and International Reporting. It won double the number that the New York
Times won, not counting the Times award won in conjunction with
ProPublica. Though winning multiple awards is considered an impressive
feat in journalistic circles, some consider this a slight upset to the
publication, which won five last year and had a record-setting seven in
2002 for its 9/11 coverage.

Does this mean print journalism continues to be of higher quality than online? Or does it mean that the Pulitzer folks are out of touch; spending the majority of their time focused on the icons as opposed to the wider variety available on the Web?

Full Story from the Columbia Spectator:

Online newsroom earns Pulitzer, Post trumps Times

ProPublica, an independent, non-profit online newsroom, became the first online organization to win a Pulitzer Prize.

By Kim Kirschenbaum

Published April 13, 2010

The Internet secured itself a prevailing role in news media on Monday, reeling in one of journalism’s most coveted prizes for the very
first time.

ProPublica, an independent, non-profit online newsroom, was the first online organization to win a Pulitzer Prize, which was announced at
Columbia’s Journalism School on Monday afternoon at a ceremony for the
94th annual Pulitzer Prizes in Journalism, Letters, Drama, and Music.

There were 1,103 newspaper entries, up from a total of 1,028 entries last year.

Pulitzer Prize administrator Sig Gissler, who commenced the announcements and later elaborated on the winners, said that
ProPublica’s model represents a mode of journalism that will become
increasingly influential, as fewer resources for investigative
journalism remain available at the disposal of news outlets.

“This is something we’re going to see more of in the years ahead because there’s going to be more and more collaboration of news entities
when it comes to enterprise journalism,” he said, referring to the
collaboration between ProPublica and the New York Times Magazine.

In addition to ProPublica’s online win, an entirely online entry won in the category of cartooning for the first time. The award was given to
Mark Fiore, for his self-syndicated animated cartoons that appeared on
the San Francisco Chronicle website.

But while the Internet did score a victory this year, up from zero awards last year, it still lags behind its more conventional
counterpart—newsprint. The Washington Post racked up the most Pulitzers,
amassing four for its work in Feature Writing, Commentary, Criticism,
and International Reporting. It won double the number that the New York
Times won, not counting the Times award won in conjunction with
ProPublica. Though winning multiple awards is considered an impressive
feat in journalistic circles, some consider this a slight upset to the
publication, which won five last year and had a record-setting seven in
2002 for its 9/11 coverage.

From a thematic standpoint, articles about natural disasters did not dominate the awards this year, as they tend to do, but rather dealt with
more “down-to-earth matters,” Gissler said.

Other news publications that won Pulitzers included the Seattle Times, the Philadelphia Daily News, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the
Dallas Morning News, the Des Moines Register, and the Denver Post.

Gissler said that, despite journalism’s continuously shifting ways as new models are explored and older ones are revamped, traditional
newspapers still remain a shining beacon for reporting.

“It’s been a tough time for newspapers the last few years, but amid the gloomy talk, I think the winners and finalists are encouraging
examples of the high quality of journalism across the nation,” Gissler
said.

And though journalistic modes change and adapt to the times, watchdog journalism—a form of investigative reporting intended to hold public
officials and institutions accountable—continues to pervade reporting,
Gissler said, as evidenced by the many winners this year who produced
content in this category. Among those he cited were articles produced
about the contamination of hamburgers, the hazardous use of cell phones
while driving, and parents who accidentally killed their children by
leaving them in their cars.

He added, “Watchdog journalism is still a vibrant force in the United States that would make Joseph Pulitzer proud.”

kim.kirschenbaum@columbiaspectator.com

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: